Comparative Analysis of Performance Parameters of MediaTek x30 and Xiaolong 835

Meizu released the world's first Meizu PRO7 flagship phone equipped with MediaTek's Helio X30 processor. We know that MediaTek Helio X30 is currently the most powerful chip of MediaTek. It is the first to adopt the advanced 10nm manufacturing process design and has very low power consumption performance. And most of its rival chip manufacturers have already released the mobile strongest chip Snapdragon 835, in fact, there is no doubt that Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 performance is definitely better than MediaTek X30. For this issue of MediaTek X30 and Xiaolong 835, in fact, many times it is not to look at performance, but also to see the performance of all aspects.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 and MediaTek Helio 830 will be the two strongest mobile processors in 2017, both of which use a 10 nanometer manufacturing process. Which one is better for the Snapdragon 835 with autonomous kryo architecture and the Helio 830 with a public version? Let's take a look at the detailed parameter comparison of the two processors.

The difference is that Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 uses its own architecture Qualcomm Kryo 280 CPU, built-in Adreno 540 graphics processor; MediaTek X30 uses dual-core 2.5GHz A73, quad-core 2.2GHz A53 and quad-core 1.9GHz A35, supplemented by PowerVR 7XTP-MT4 Graphics processor.

In particular, unlike the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, MediaTek X30 only supports Cat.13, which does not meet the Cat.16 network standard.

骁龙835 uses 10m eight core design, the size of the core is Wangyo architecture, large core frequency 2.45GHz, small core frequency 1.9CHz, GPU is adreno 540, support 4K screen, UFS 2.1, dual camera and LPDR4X four channel memory, integration Cat.16 baseband.

Helio 830 uses 10m ten core public version architecture, large core uses 473 architecture frequency 2.8GHz, small core uses 4 A53 architecture frequency 2.2GHZ and 4 A35 architecture frequency 2.0GHz; GPU is quad core PTR 7400XT, supports 4K screen, UFS 2.1, dual camera and LPDDR4X four-channel memory, integrated with Cat.10 baseband.

The same thing about the two processors is that they all use a 10 nanometer manufacturing process, and the memory uses four channels of LPDDR4X and UFS2.1 flash memory, all supporting up to 4K resolution.

In different places, the number of cores is different. The Snapdragon 835 uses 8 cores, while Helio uses 10 cores.

Different architecture cores, Xiaolong 835 adopts the self-developed kryo architecture. In 2016, the flagship processor 820 adopts the kryo architecture, which also allows the world to see the great power of the independent architecture for the first time. The X30 uses the public version of the 473/A53/A35 architecture, which is not comparable to the kxryo architecture.

The GPU is different. Although the X3O GPU uses the quad-core PVR 7400XT to support 4K resolution, you know that Qualcomm has been at the forefront of GPU.

Fast charging technology, Qualcomm's latest Quick Charge 4.0 technology has matured, and MediaTek has a long way to go.

From the above comparison, it can be seen that although the X30 is in the same level as the Xiaolong 835 in some respects, there are still gaps in many aspects. If the MediaTek wants to narrow the gap with Qualcomm in 2017, it is obviously not enough to only take out a 830. .

In view of the fact that several models of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 mobile phones have been listed in China, everyone is very familiar with the comprehensive performance of Snapdragon 835. However, the overall performance score of MediaTek Helio X30 can be achieved, and in comparison with Qualcomm Xiaolong 835 in terms of 3D performance scores and UX performance scores, who is taller and lower?

Next, the small series brings the data of each run.

From the point of running test, MediaTek X30 has a big gap with Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 in terms of overall performance and 3D performance, but there is not much difference in UX performance and CPU performance.

ZGAR bar 600 Puffs

ZGAR bar 600 Puffs

ZGAR electronic cigarette uses high-tech R&D, food grade disposable pod device and high-quality raw material. All package designs are Original IP. Our designer team is from Hong Kong. We have very high requirements for product quality, flavors taste and packaging design. The E-liquid is imported, materials are food grade, and assembly plant is medical-grade dust-free workshops.

Our products include disposable e-cigarettes, rechargeable e-cigarettes, rechargreable disposable vape pen, and various of flavors of cigarette cartridges. From 600puffs to 5000puffs, ZGAR bar Disposable offer high-tech R&D, E-cigarette improves battery capacity, We offer various of flavors and support customization. And printing designs can be customized. We have our own professional team and competitive quotations for any OEM or ODM works.

We supply OEM rechargeable disposable vape pen,OEM disposable electronic cigarette,ODM disposable vape pen,ODM disposable electronic cigarette,OEM/ODM vape pen e-cigarette,OEM/ODM atomizer device.

Disposable Vape, bar 600puffs, ZGAR bar disposable, Disposable E-cigarette, OEM/ODM disposable vape pen atomizer Device E-cig

ZGAR INTERNATIONAL(HK)CO., LIMITED , https://www.zgarvape.com